Do Odinists who protest against the deleterious effects of Christianity upon our folk “just hate Jesus”, or “hate Christianity”, or are we trying to “divide our people”? Does our disagreeing with the insanity of worshiping a foreign god, which has led to the virtual extinction of White Europeans, and of our identity and culture, make us “haters”?
Well firstly, I should say that I am delighted to be called a hater, because anyone whose emotions as so shallow and constricted and controlled by a Jewish god that he or she cannot hate, cannot love either. Some of us do hate Christianity, and this would not be surprising because it is a major cause of White genocide, making the primary reason for hating Christianity love of one’s own folk.
From the initial destruction of the Roman Empire by Christians who at that time, of course, were mostly Jews, to the Christian- led genocides of Heathen folk in Northern Europe, to the witch and heretic hunts, we see a steady progression of Christian-committed White death all around us, and I have not even mentioned Jewish and Christian- promoted wars, such as the White genocide known as WW2, or Christian proposed efforts to “take back” the “holy land”, which one idiot or traitor, who bills himself as a White Nationalist, is suggesting even now.
What an insane aim when Europe, America, and other White nations, are being invaded by Jewish led non European immigration… Let’s just go kill more Arabs for Jews…. Why are we not protecting our own European nations all over the globe from the Jewish led “immigrant” invasion, Matthew Heimbach? He never answered this question. He also never answered the question of whether he put the White race or the Jewish “god” first, or why he spends so much time praying for Arabs rather than Europeans, or why it is he was trashing Odinism on Facebook if he really wants unity.
I often see White Nationalist Christians making comments about how it is the Catholics who are evil, not Protestants, or vice versa. The Orthodox Church is also often set up as an example of a group in favor of White Nationalism, but sadly, this is not the case. This is the unfortunate, but truthful, answer to the “It is not Protestants who support Jewish terrorism, it is the Catholics”… and, “It’s not Orthodox who support the Jewish take-over, it’s Western Catholics!” arguments… They are ALL anti-White and they are all created and controlled by Jews! Odinism is our native European religion and our Gods are on our side.
The Methodist Church is hardly the only anti-White Christian organization. Every one I have looked into seems to be conducting a giant White genocide program in the name of “religion”, shunting funds away from European people and nations, and sending them to non European people and nations. Often Jews are in charge of these financial operations and initiatives. White people are supposed to act as doormats, providing funding, sometimes even by giving up all their assets, even to the point of selling their houses, and helping to impoverish, not just themselves, but their descendants, by going to act as missionaries in Third World nations.
Most of the social programs in America and Europe would seem to be geared to enhance the identity of non Whites, and there are all sorts of groups, services, and monetary aid for them too, but typically, there is nothing at all for Whites, except of course, the chance to humbly serve other races as slaves to the Jew “god”.
Recently, there was a speech by the President of the Council of Bishops of the Methodist Church which was so outrageously hateful toward Europeans, and so inaccurate, that it borders upon insanity, but in reality, this sort of thing would appear to be common Christian practice. At first the Bishop was willing to receive the questions apparently, then he was “on vacation”, and now he appears to have stepped down and been replaced by another president, but we have not received an answer to these questions yet. He does not appear to have been president of the Council of Bishops long. Did he leave his post specifically in order to avoid answering questions like mine?
I have contacted the Methodist Church headquarters and expressed my concern that they have made statements to the 97% Jewish owned media, but not to European owned media (namely us), and have suggested that if they really think all people are equal, it seems only fair that they address issues of importance to European ancestry people as well. We shall see if the Bishop gets back to us. We hope so. Meanwhile, you might be interested to see what I asked and what statements this White Christian man made.
Sent: Friday, July 29, 2016 8:05 PM
Subject: questions for Bishop Bruce Ough
Dear Diane, and Bishop Bruce R. Ough,
I understand that Diane will forward these questions to you, Bruce, and I thank you both very much in advance for your help. Our article will either be in our Foxfire Journal (a tribal religious journal) or on our main website. Occasionally I allude to current events such as these in what you would call sermons, which are videotaped at times as well. Everyone has his or own point of view, and while we may personally agree or disagree on various issues, you may rest assured that we shall always portray your views honestly and accurately. Our philosophy is honor based, unlike Christianity which is obedience based, so we try to be extremely honorable. In order to make things easier to read, I have highlighted the questions in blue.
I have three major areas of interest in the Methodist Church views and policies on gun rights and race. One would be the “no guns in church” policy which I understand is nationwide in America and perhaps international as well? More on this later, but, in short, I wonder at the premise that was made that guns are dangerous and frighten people and that having no guns keeps people safe. One obvious incident that relates to this policy is the recent murder of a priest in France last week. One might argue that he and his congregation might have been far safer with guns than without guns.That would be my first question. What is your personal feeling and/or that of the Methodist Church on the “No guns in Church” policy as regards the murder of Jacques Hamel?
In regard to your statement made on the 8th of July 2016. “Council president speaks following shooting deaths”, there seem to be some extremely inaccurate premises too, and what could easily be interpreted as highly biased, or even “racist”, statements as well. Mind you, I am the last person in the world to wish to place such labels on anyone, and believe you may simply have been uniformed about the true statistics, or even purposely misinformed. Regardless, in light of the reality of the situation, I do find the statement an astonishing one, and it raises several questions.
Some phrases from your statement..
The deaths of young black males in encounters with white police officers call for the need of a bi-partisan political and legal response, beyond (but including) the statements and prayers of the church. The subsequent deaths of police officers remind us of the honorable service of the great majority of these public servants and the destructive cycle of violence and retribution
Before asking questions, I need to give you some information.. Far more Blacks commit crimes than Whites despite the fact that Blacks are less numerous in the population. Even though Whites commit far fewer criminal acts, they are shot at by the police far more than Blacks are. Consider, for example, the statistics of New York, the largest law enforcement agency. In New York, Whites are less than 3 percent of those who criminally fire weapons, while Blacks (who make up only 23 percent of the population) are over 70 percent of the shooters. Of those killed by police, Whites (who are only 3 percent of the criminal shooters) were an astounding 44 percent of those killed. Blacks (who were over 70 percent of the shooters) make up an astoundingly low, 22 percent of those killed.
It is an undeniable fact that Blacks are far less likely to be fired upon or hit by police gunfire, despite the markedly higher proportion of their criminal activities, so there is no “racial injustice” to right here. Another interesting point is that in the range of this particular study, there are no, that would be zero, recorded incidents of White suspects in New York actually firing guns at the police. Nearly 70 percent of all shots fired at the police in that city came from armed Black people, and the rest from Hispanics. So, to recap, even though not a single White suspect fired at any police officer, 44 percent of those killed by police were White. In the light of this information, why are you not commenting upon the real racial injustice at work here, that against White Europeans? Do you intend to do so?
We acknowledge our complicity in the sin of institutional racism, which denies the inherently sacred nature of every person…
I suppose we might be entering into the strictly theological here, but on what basis do you speak of “institutional racism” in regard, presumably, to Black people or African Americans? African Americans are being given bonus points on their college SATS for admissions in some universities, as well as special Blacks-only scholarships, and affirmative action guarantees that better qualified White applicants for jobs actually will be discriminated against. There are many political and charitable organizations looking after the interests of Black African ancestry people, but none whatsoever to look after the interests of White European ancestry people.
In consideration of this, could you explain how White Europeans are complicit in the “sin” of institutionalized racism? If you are against institutionalized racism, why are you doing nothing about affirmative action and the clear lack of help available to Whites in the areas, of scholarships, jobs, charity, and in political protection of their tribal interests?
We claim the essential need for all Christians of privilege to listen and seek deeper understanding when our brothers and sisters cry out for justice. We commit ourselves to speak on behalf of those who are denied justice. We support the difficult work of those in law enforcement and at the same time seek ways of moving toward better community engagement. We pledge to address the problem of mass incarceration of young black males in our society. .
I assume this reference, “Christians of privilege” refers to White European heritage people? If so, as a Methodist, what do you mean by the term “privileged”?
It is a verifiable fact that Blacks and other people of non European ancestry are responsible for the vast majority of violent crime in the United States. The reason that Black males are in jail more is because they commit more crimes. On 4 separate occasions Blacks have held guns to my head before I reached the age of 23. The only reason it was not more was because I was able to leave the Black neighborhood I lived in and the Black school I attended. Am I lying or “racist” , is this some sort of plot to incarcerate innocent Black males? (-; Or, instead of thinking that all people are equal, do you in fact think that White Europeans are in some way lesser human beings than Blacks and deserving of less consideration? What about the White victims of Black crime? Why have you not expressed any concern for them?
According to Dept. of Justice figure from a few years ago, some 89% of all violent inter-racial crime is committed by Blacks with Whites as victims.. This “destructive cycle of violence and retribution” that you refer to has Black African ancestry people committing the violence, and also expecting to exact “retribution” for violence that they themselves have committed. Why is it that you encourage White European ancestry people, and only White European ancestry people, to endure epidemic levels of racially motivated crimes, and true institutionalized racism as well, and at the same time acknowledge guilt for crimes they have not committed and also accept “retribution” from those that committed these crimes as their due? Could you tell me where or what the biblical basis for this sort of attitude is? I would very much like to know.
We confess that we have often allowed our ideological differences to become more important than our unity in the One Body. We repent of our temptation to live in fear of one another and to seek security apart from God.
The same almost unbelievably high rates of violent crime pertain in all Black African nations, in fact, the same super high levels of violent crime pertain anywhere Blacks live, not just in America. This is not a “racist” or hateful statement, but a physical reality.The more Blacks in any given nation, the more crime, since their presence raises the crime rate astronomically over that of European ancestry folk or other racial groups. The more guns, the less crime.
For example, Switzerland, where every adult male citizen has a gun, and where there is some attempt to resist the waves of mass non European immigration happening currently, is one of the safest places in the world. The next subject may be very unpolitcally correct indeed, but for the sake of honest discussion, I shall raise it, since, after all it is not guns who kill people, but people who kill people.
Based on actual reality, such as the factors we have mentioned, banning Blacks and other non European ancestry persons from churches, would almost certainly do more to curb crime, than banning guns that normal law abiding people (including, ironically, other Black people, who are the main victims of Black crime), than banning guns would. I am in no way suggesting such a thing, but it bears thinking about since it is true. Do you seriously suggest that White European ancestry people and Black people who are not criminals should leave themselves vulnerable to Black crime and remain unarmed, expecting a Judeo-Christian god to protect them? Do you actually believe that it is sinful, even in the view of all the verifiable information I presented above, for White Europeans specifically to protect themselves with guns from Blacks and expect them to only seek security from a Jewish God?
Last, but not least, while looking at your website, I came across a “social justice”grant which says it is meant to…
…promote just national and international policies and actions (governmental and non-governmental) seeking to restore communities and respond to the disproportionate effect of injustices on racial and ethnic persons.
…provide grants to strengthen the ethnic local church through education, advocacy, or leadership training and development as they engage in social justice. Grant recipients must be programs initiated by or developed in partnership with one or more United Methodist ethnic local churches. Racial/ethnic persons shall be the majority of those served by the program. The project must focus on needs identified by ethnic local churches as they address one or more chronic social problems or concerns, such as housing, employment, health care, human rights, education, the environment and racism.
I assume that just as “Christians of Privilege” are White, that “Racial/Ethnic Persons” are non White? Perhaps whoever wrote this is not aware that White European people also have ethnicity and exist? Why are only non European ancestry people helped in regard to social justice issues and racism by the Methodist Church? For example, why is nothing being done to fight anti-European hate organizations that seek to take away the rights, and religious and ethnic symbols of Europeans, such as the SPLC and ADL? If all people are the same, each as valuable as the other, spiritually, why are European people specifically not being helped?
I am grateful for your help in making these matters clear, Bruce. I am very much looking forward to learning more about your Christian views and values and hope the answers to these questions may prove to be instructive to both of us.
Best regards and many thanks,
I think we Odinists and soon- to- be Odinists, tribal Agnostics, and other White Nationalists can agree on one thing in regard to the seething anti White hatred of the various permutations of The Church. We can do better.